Vitals & voices
The Research Presentation

Vitals & Voices 2026 is a premier academic platform designed to bridge the gap between clinical
research and impactful communication. This event celebrates not only the scientific rigor of
research but also the ability to translate complex medical findings into clear, compelling, and
meaningful narratives.

In modern medicine, data alone is not enough—what truly matters is how effectively that data
informs, influences, and inspires. Vitals & Voices challenges participants to move beyond
traditional presentations and transform their research into engaging stories that resonate with
both academic and clinical audiences.

This competition provides undergraduate MBBS students across all phases an opportunity to:

• Showcase clinically conducted research

• Develop scientific communication skills

• Engage in academic discourse with peers and experts

• Contribute to evidence-based medical learning

By integrating critical thinking, clarity, and creativity, the event aims to cultivate future clinicians
who are not only skilled researchers but also effective communicators.

​

Event Structure

The competition follows a two-stage format:

1. Abstract Screening Round

● Participants submit original clinical research abstracts
● Abstracts undergo evaluation for:
1. Scientific merit
2. Relevance
3. Originality
● Selected abstracts qualify for oral presentation
● Non-selected entries may be considered for poster presentation

2. Oral Presentation Round

● Each participant delivers:
1. 6-minute presentation

2-minute question & answer session

● Presentations must follow a structured scientific format:
* Title
* Aims & Objectives
* Methodology
* Results
* Discussion
* Implications
* Conclusion
* References

​

What the Event Focuses On

Vitals & Voices emphasizes three core pillars:

1. Scientific Rigor
● Accuracy and validity of research
● Ethical compliance (IEC approval mandatory)
● Clinical relevance

2. Clarity of Communication
● Simplifying complex data
● Logical flow and coherence
● Effective use of visuals

3. Impact & Insight
● Real-world applicability
● Critical interpretation of findings
● Contribution to medical knowledge

​

Judging Criteria (total out of 50)

Participants will be evaluated by a panel of experts based on the following comprehensive criteria:

1. Content & Scientific Depth (10)
* Clear articulation of aims and objectives
* Depth of analysis and discussion

* Interpretation of results
* Integration with existing literature

2. Presentation Skills (10)
* Clarity of speech and confidence
* Logical organization and flow
* Ability to engage the audience
* Time management

3. Visual & Slide Design (10)
* Clarity and readability of slides
* Effective use of graphs, tables, and images
* Minimal clutter and professional formatting

4. Impact & Originality (10)
* Innovation in research or perspective
* Practical implications of the study
* Contribution to clinical practice or future research

5. Response to Questions (10)
* Understanding of the subject
* Ability to justify methodology and conclusions
* Critical thinking and spontaneity

​

Why Participate?

Vitals & Voices is more than a competition—it is a learning experience that:
* Enhances presentation and research skills
* Builds academic confidence
* Encourages evidence-based thinking
* Provides recognition for outstanding work

Top performers from each category will be awarded, recognizing excellence in both science and storytelling.

​

Rules & Regulations

​

General Rules

* The competition is open only to undergraduate MBBS students (Phase I, II, III Part I & II).
* Participants may present individually or in teams (if applicable—clarify based on your decision).
* Each participant/team is allowed only one abstract submission.
* The research presented must be original and clinically conducted.

​

Abstract & Submission Rules
* Abstracts must adhere strictly to the format and guidelines provided.
* Plagiarism must be <10%, and certification may be required.
* Abstract once submitted cannot be modified after the deadline.
* Late submissions will not be accepted under any circumstances.
* The decision of the screening committee will be final and binding.

​

Mandatory Documentation
Participants must submit:
* Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval
* Endorsement letter from Head of Institution/Dean

Failure to provide these will result in disqualification.

​

Presentation Rules
* Presentation time must not exceed 6 minutes.
* A strict 2-minute Q&A will follow.
* Exceeding time limits may result in penalty or disqualification.
* Presentation must be in .pptx format only.
* Slides must follow:
* Font: Times New Roman
* Clear, readable font size
* Content must follow the prescribed structure.

​

Conduct & Ethics

* Any form of plagiarism, data fabrication, or falsification will lead to immediate disqualification.

* Participants must maintain professional conduct throughout the event.
* Misrepresentation of data or unethical research practices will not be tolerated.

​

Technical & Logistical Rules

* Participants must report on time for their scheduled slot.
* No changes in presentation order will be entertained unless approved by organizers.
* Participants are advised to carry a backup of their presentation (USB/cloud).
* The organizing committee will not be responsible for technical failures due to participant error.

​

Judging & Awards

* Judges’ decisions are final and non-negotiable.
* Top 3 presentations in each category will be awarded.
* Feedback may or may not be provided at the discretion of the panel.

​

Registration Rules

* Abstract submission is free of cost.
* Selected participants must complete registration (₹400) within 3 days of notification.
* Failure to register within the deadline will lead to forfeiture of selection.